Scale!Paging Dr. Nancy
Posted 14 December 2012 - 08:36 PM
It's produced by something called the Abbeville Institute, a think tank that wants to provide the intellectual firepower for Southern succession. (The Chronicle of Higher Education is predictably up in arms about them.)
Posted 15 December 2012 - 07:18 AM
Posted 15 December 2012 - 04:34 PM
For the city man, a massive government seems logical to manage a massive collection of people. And it does address certain short term problems, particularly those involving the allocation of major resources and the mass commerce that develops. The new scale of business can efficiently serve mass society and also fill the void of identity left by weakening nationalism (with branded consumerism and class niches). But of course these large businesses must be regulated because their interests do not align with those of either the government or the citizenry. Regulation is somewhat effective in the short term, but eventually power and wealth buy the influence they need--this is unavoidable, whether the mass society has a small government or a large one. By the same token, allocation of resources on this mass scale--which can only be done by large government--has considerable complexity costs.
The next evolution then is a government and business that develop aligned interests--partly because the same elites move back and forth between the two (this is of course no longer a scandal, it being assumed that all government officials will inevitably pass through the revolving door to serve the needs of large business). This is in fact our present state.
This leaves us with some very big problems. Devolution of power is not likely barring a cataclysmic failure of central government, which no one wishes for. Regardless, there will probably be a lengthy run-up involving years or decades of stagnation and general strife, the time frame depending on whether there is a crisis to help things along. Candidates include massive climate shift, depletion of essential resources, other major environmental disaster, disruptive civil unrest, and of course war.
Moreover, opposition to a controlled break-up on the part of one of the major power blocs, Jews, is likely to be fierce. Jews will tend to equate regionalism with Southern secessionists and white separatism, and Jews stand the most to lose with the formation of regional nations or sub-nations (this is because their power base is geographically limited). Nevertheless, I still think our best chance of coping with the disasters that scale will produce is to continue spreading these ideas as far as possible, not only to other conservatives but to moderates and liberals as well.